war

the ultimate ideological weapon

Just look at what happened, the build-up to the war in Iraq in 2003. Anyone who dissented—anyone who dissented from an illegal war of aggression was accused of being an appeaser of Hitler. Now can you imagine that? The Nazi holocaust has now become the main ideological weapon for justifying wars of aggression. That’s a fact. Every time Israel and the United States want to launch an illegal war of aggression, what do they charge? That their enemy is Hitler. Ahmadinejad, he’s Hitler. Hezbollah’s Hitler. Hamas is Hitler. Every time they want to commit an illegal war of aggression, they use the Nazi holocaust to justify it. Now that’s the ultimate irony. The Nazi holocaust has become the chief, the main ideological weapon for waging illegal wars of aggression.

US vetos at the UN Security Council

List compiled by Geoff Williams

Russia has used their veto TWICE

Year: Resolution Vetoed by the USA

  • 1972 Condemns Israel for killing hundreds of people in Syria and Lebanon in air raids.
  • 1973 Afirms the rights of the Palestinians and calls on Israel to withdraw from the occupied territories.
  • 1976 Condemns Israel for attacking Lebanese civilians.
  • 1976 Condemns Israel for building settlements in the occupied territories.
  • 1976 Calls for self determination for the Palestinians.
  • 1976 Afirms the rights of the Palestinians.
  • 1978 Urges the permanent members (USA, USSR, UK, France, China) to insure United Nations decisions on the maintenance of international peace and security.
  • 1978 Criticises the living conditions of the Palestinians.
  • 1978 Condemns the Israeli human rights record in occupied territories.
  • 1978 Calls for developed countries to increase the quantity and quality of development assistance to underdeveloped countries.
  • 1979 Calls for an end to all military and nuclear collaboration with the apartheid South Africa.
  • 1979 Strengthens the arms embargo against South Africa.
  • 1979 Offers assistance to all the oppressed people of South Africa and their liberation movement.
  • 1979 Concerns negotiations on disarmament and cessation of the nuclear arms race.
  • 1979 Calls for the return of all inhabitants expelled by Israel.
  • 1979 Demands that Israel desist from human rights violations.
  • 1979 Requests a report on the living conditions of Palestinians in occupied Arab countries.
  • 1979 Offers assistance to the Palestinian people.
  • 1979 Discusses sovereignty over national resources in occupied Arab territories.
  • iran and the bomb

    2007, in a closed discussion: Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni said that in her opinion "Iranian nuclear weapons do not pose an existential threat to Israel." She "also criticized the exaggerated use that [Israeli] Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is making of the issue of the Iranian bomb, claiming that he is attempting to rally the public around him by playing on its most basic fears.1"

    2009: "A senior Israeli official in Washington" asserted that "Iran would be unlikely to use its missiles in an attack [against Israel] because of the certainty of retaliation.2"

    In 2010 the Sunday Times of London (January 10) reported that Brigadier-General Uzi Eilam, war hero, pillar of the Israeli defense establishment, and former director-general of Israel's Atomic Energy Commission, "believes it will probably take Iran seven years to make nuclear weapons."

    Early last month, US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta told a television audience: "Are they [Iran] trying to develop a nuclear weapon? No, but we know that they're trying to develop a nuclear capability.3"

    A week later we could read in the New York Times (January 15) that "three leading Israeli security experts — the Mossad chief, Tamir Pardo, a former Mossad chief, Efraim Halevy, and a former military chief of staff, Dan Halutz — all recently declared that a nuclear Iran would not pose an existential threat to Israel."

    Then, a few days afterward, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak, in an interview with Israeli Army Radio (January 18), had this exchange:

    Question: Is it Israel's judgment that Iran has not yet decided to turn its nuclear potential into weapons of mass destruction?

    • 1. Haaretz.com (Israel), October 25, 2007; print edition October 26
    • 2. Washington Post, March 5, 2009
    • 3. "Face the Nation", CBS, January 8, 2012

    world's top seven military budgets

    Between 2001 and 2011 the [US] Department of Defense’s base budget, which excludes war and nuclear weapons funding, grew from $390 billion to $540 billion, an increase of 38 percent.

    SIPRI

    no bravery

    we're going to war with Iraq

    I had been through the Pentagon right after 9/11. About ten days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the Joint Staff who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me in. He said, "Sir, you’ve got to come in and talk to me a second." I said, "Well, you’re too busy." He said, "No, no." He says, "We’ve made the decision we’re going to war with Iraq." This was on or about the 20th of September. I said, "We’re going to war with Iraq? Why?" He said, "I don’t know." He said, "I guess they don’t know what else to do." So I said, "Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda?" He said, "No, no." He says, "There’s nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq." He said, "I guess it’s like we don’t know what to do about terrorists, but we’ve got a good military and we can take down governments." And he said, "I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail."

    So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, "Are we still going to war with Iraq?" And he said, "Oh, it’s worse than that." He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, "I just got this down from upstairs" — meaning the Secretary of Defense’s office — "today." And he said, "This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran." I said, "Is it classified?" He said, "Yes, sir."

    Syndicate content