racism

You are not authorized to post comments.

our minister for equalities

"Equality is not an aside for me; it is not an after-thought or a secondary consideration. It is at the heart of what this coalition government is about...

I do not believe in a world where everybody gets the same out of life, regardless of what they put in.

That is why no government should try to ensure equal outcomes for everyone."

Theresa May, Equality strategy speech

So she scrapped the socio-economic duty:

"Just look at the socio-economic duty. It was meant to force public authorities to take into account inequality of outcome when making decisions about their policies.

...In reality, it would have been just another bureaucratic box to be ticked. It would have meant more time filling in forms and less time focusing on policies that will make a real difference to people’s life chances."

(From the same speech)

Like cutting benefits for people who depend on them. That will make a difference to their life chances. Or kicking them out of their council homes and making higher education too expensive for their children. Or lowering corporation tax (again), because business should be protected, but people not.

Or removing the only possibility that those who are not millionaires might have to access justice, one of those 'civil liberties' that the condom-heads pretend to value. Fair trials for the barons. A different life chance for the proles, because we would not want the outcome of unfair behaviour to be the same for proles and barons. What a boring, bureacratic box-tick that would be.

And our Equalities Minister also had a go at encouraging the police to stop and search discriminately, on the basis of a person's ethnic origin, because people of certain ethnic origins (not hers) should have a difference made to their life chances too:

the decaffeinated 'other'

On today's market, we find a whole series of products deprived of their malignant property: coffee without caffeine, cream without fat, beer without alcohol. And the list goes on: what about virtual sex as sex without sex? The Colin Powell doctrine of warfare with no casualties (on our side, of course) as warfare without warfare? The contemporary redefinition of politics as the art of expert administration as politics without politics? This leads us to today's tolerant liberal multiculturalism as an experience of the Other deprived of its Otherness – the decaffeinated Other...

After righteously rejecting direct populist racism as "unreasonable" and unacceptable for our democratic standards, [our governments] endorse "reasonably" racist protective measures or, as today's Brasillachs, some of them even Social Democrats, tell us: "We grant ourselves permission to applaud African and east European sportsmen, Asian doctors, Indian software programmers. We don't want to kill anyone, we don't want to organise any pogrom. But we also think that the best way to hinder the always unpredictable violent anti-immigrant defensive measures is to organise a reasonable anti-immigrant protection."

the left and anti-immigrant movements

I think there is a failure in this standard, liberal, multicultural vision, which means every ethnic group, whatever, to itself, all we need is a neutral legal framework guaranteeing the coexistence of groups. Sorry if I shock someone, but I think we do need what Germans call Leitkultur, leading culture. Just it shouldn’t be nationally defined. We should fight for that. Yes, I agree with right-wingers. We need a set of values accepted by all. But what will these values be, my god? We neglected this a little bit. You know that it’s not just this abstract liberal model: you have your world, I have my world, we just need a neutral legal network—how we will politely ignore each other.

My second point would have been that it’s absolutely crucial how this anti-immigrant explosion is linked to the withdrawal of leftist politics, especially in the matters of economy and so on. It is as if the left, being obsessed by the idea that we shouldn’t appear as reactionary in the economic sense, that is to say that "No, no, no, we are not the old trade union representatives of the working class, we are for postmodern digital capitalism" and so on. They don’t want to touch the working class or so-called lower ordinary people. And here right-wingers enter. Do you know, the horrible paradox is that, apart from some small leftist fringe parties, the only serious political force in Europe today which still is ready to appeal to the ordinary working people are the right-wing anti-immigrants? So you see, we, the leftists, we have no right, absolutely no right, to take this arrogant view of offended tolerant people who are horrored—no, we should ask the question, how we enabled what is going on.

the parasitic roma

UPDATED
Letter to MD
MD reply (1)
My reply (1)
MD reply (2)
My reply (2)

There are whole [Roma] families living without sanitation, without utilities, working in the black economy if at all, whose life in France is nonetheless more pleasant and profitable than it probably was, or ever would be, where they came from. There is no reason for them to return. As it is, though, they are parasites on a state of civilisation, material and cultural, they have done nothing to build and could not reproduce for themselves.

Mary Dejevsky in the Independent, Sarkozy is right about the Roma

Now where have I seen something similar... ?

Because the Gypsies have manifestly a heavily tainted heredity and because they are inveterate criminals who constitute parasites in the bosom of our people, it is fitting in the first place to watch them closely, to prevent them from reproducing themselves...

From a memorandum by Tobias Portschy, the Nazi leader in Steiermark (Burgenland) to Dr Lammers, Chief of the Chancellery (1938)

And this, also vaguely reminiscent...

The Gypsies, especially in the district of the lower court of Oberwarth where about 4,000 of them live, are a danger, less from the political than from the racial and economic point of view. Among them the pure bred (black) Gypsies probably constitute the majority. They subsist almost exclusively by begging and stealing. Their activities as musicians represent more a camouflage than a means of earning a living. Their existence is an extraordinarily great burden for the honest working population, especially the farmers whose fields they plunder, a burden growing from year to year. The mass of the Gypsies still resemble externally primitive African or Asiatic peoples...

Part of a letter from Dr Meissner, General Public Prosecutor in Graz, in 1940, recommended sterilisation of all Gypsies in the Burgenland.

no right to own for the natives

In the British colonial cities of eastern and southern Africa... native populations [were denied] the rights of urban land ownership and permanent residence. The British... feared that city life would "detribalise" Africans and foster anti-colonial solidarities. Urban migration was controlled by pass laws, while vagrancy ordinances penalised informal labour. Until 1954, for instance, Africans were considered only temporary sojourners in racially zoned Nairobi and were unable to own leasehold property. Likewise Africans in Dar-es-Salaam, according to researcher Karin Nuru, "were only tolerated as a temporary labour force and had to return to the countryside." In Rhodesia, Africans had to ewait until the eve of independence to acquire the legal right to own urban homes, while in Lusaka... African residents were considered to be "more or less temporary urbanites whose only purpose in town was service to the administration's personnel."

we as a family are dead

My husband was re-arrested for alleged breaches of his control order on at least four different occasions. Once he was arrested for having the Nintendo Wii which was the gift to our children. Once it was for having "mobile phones" in the home – they were actually toys purchased from the pound shop.

We, as a family, are dead. We are sick of the police and the Government's torture of our family that has gone on for eight years. Our family has been held hostage in Britain. My husband and I escaped torture at the hand of the Israelis to find worse torture in the UK. I now find myself in another country – Jordan – where I have sought asylum from the torture that Britain has placed me and my family under.

Syndicate content