bystanders

collaborators

antarchi's picture

I went out to Russia in 1991 - still just the Soviet Union - certain that anyone who had not fought against, or stood up in some way against the regime was a collaborator. I went out partly to understand how a society of collaborators, collaborators on a mass scale, a scale of many millions - how it could exist. What was the mind of a collaborator like? How did they square their personal principles with what was happening around them? How did they excuse their failure to condemn the evil acts of the regime and their continuing participation in the structures set up by that regime - all essential to its continuing existence?

the hottest place in hell

antarchi's picture

The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who in time of great moral crises maintain their neutrality.

moral obligation to intervene

antarchi's picture

Two years later, a Commons Select Committee would conclude: ‘Britain had a legal right to intervene [in the Turkish assault on Cyprus], she had a moral obligation to intervene, she had the military capacity to intervene. She did not intervene for reasons which the government refuses to give.’

free passage to attila

antarchi's picture

The reality is that Britain had both the means and the obligation to stop the Turkish assault on Cyprus. After first ensuring Turkish hostility to the Greek majority, it had imposed a Treaty of Guarantee on the island, depriving it of true independence, for its own selfish ends: the retention of large military enclaves at its sovereign disposal. Now, when called on to abide by the treaty, it crossed its arms and gave free passage to the modern Attila, claiming that it was helpless – a nuclear power – to do otherwise.

does this road lead to the cathedral?

antarchi's picture

"Does this road lead to the cathedral?"
"No, this is Varlam Street, it doesn't lead to the Cathedral"
"Well what's the point of a road, if it doesn't lead to the Cathedral?"

From Tengiz Abuladze's 'Repentance' Pokoyanie)

That exchange comes right at the end of the film. I was reminded by it of a quote from Thomas Nagel, that philosophers are after the truth, even though they know that's not what they're going to get (or words to that effect).

hammer action (continued)

antarchi's picture

There are so many - infinite - ways of responding to something someone does. Condemning and condoning are often taken as the only options, between which lies that wonderfully convenient no-man's-land: 'not taking a stand'.
Here are some of the other things you can say or do if you happen to come across a man in the street hitting a child on the head with a hammer (hammer action):
- Nothing
- Shut your eyes
- Divert attention from the hammer action, so that no-one else notices
- Tell the child to stop crying
- Tell the man to stop hitting
- Take away the hammer
- Quietly ask the man to move himself, his hammer and the child away from public view
- Make hammers illegal
- Hit the man
- Disperse the crowd gathering around the hammer action
- Make a speech condemning the man
- Make a speech condemning hammer action
- Make a speech condemning children on the streets
- Make a speech about human rights
- Make a citizen's arrest
- Organise an international campaign against hammer action
- Put your head under the hammer

Syndicate content